neutralzz 0 Report post Posted December 6, 2005 huangyong, thanks for the tip. You mean a 220:220 + 6.3V or 220:220 + 19V transformer isn't readily available? Is the 220:18 + 18:220 you mentioned earlier thread feasible? Shipping a heavy item like a transformer is going to cost I was just looking and reading about Earmax/Earmax Pro vs the Morgan-Jones and there appear to be something missing in the M-J version. How did the Earmax people get everything into such a small enclosure? The original power adaptor is a 19VAC one, which powers the 3 filaments in series. But how the Earmax/Earmax Pro derive get the 220VDC with the apparent lack of another transformer is the interesting bit. Anyone has one of these babies and don't mind posting photos of its internals? Regards CK i got one here, if you point to point solder on a smaller compact board, confirm can fit into the earmaxpro size earmax power supply external, so the size kept to very small huangyong -> checked well audio for transformer yet? martin should have also/ very ex though there.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ckng 0 Report post Posted December 7, 2005 i got one here, if you point to point solder on a smaller compact board, confirm can fit into the earmaxpro size earmax power supply external, so the size kept to very small The external power supply supplies 19VAC right? How does the EarMax Pro derive the 200+ VDC without a 2nd transformer then? That's the bit I am trying to understand If you don't mind can you post the pics? Regards CK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neutralzz 0 Report post Posted December 7, 2005 haha its not too difficult! considering our socket is 200+v already, just need to rectify it to get DC tubes used to be horizontal but i modified to be vertical, sounds better Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
neutralzz 0 Report post Posted December 7, 2005 oh ya forgive the messiness at the jack area.. used to be very neat.. hehe i added 2 resistors to decrease "hum", tame the highs a little Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ckng 0 Report post Posted December 9, 2005 Thanks neutralzz. I thought you were saying you have the original Earmax Pro, which I am very interested to know how the inside looks like. Reading through some reviews and other information below, http://www.headwize.com/ubb/showpage.php?f...1890&fpage=ptid http://www.audioxpress.com/reviews/media/902hansen2017.pdf this is what I gathered: 1. Power supply has a 3-pin connector to the Earmax Pro. This is probably 19-0-19 since we need 19VAC for the filaments. 2. It uses voltage doubler circuit to raise the voltage from the power supply. Since it's a 19-0-19, the max we can get out of it is (19x2) x 1.414 x 2 = 107.46VDC which is still lower than the 220VDC spec'ed for the MJ mini. Has anyone tried it this way vs 2 transformers or a custom transformer? Regards CK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
huangyong 0 Report post Posted December 11, 2005 ckng.. why don't you try first i will support you, spiritually.. here a link, i think the keyword to use is voltage multiplier, m i right? high Voltage Cockcroft-walton quite fun though.. if not for tube then can make something to give "nice" electric sensation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
huangyong 0 Report post Posted December 11, 2005 check out this as well 250vDC PSU Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
huangyong 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2005 no one trying? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ckng 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2005 Haven't got around to. Been busy. Regards CK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edison 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2006 a US diyer have finished it.url:http://www6.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=87661 FAQ: - Is this amp based on the ordinary EarMax or the EarMax Pro? Yes,it is besed on EarMax Pro. hey, digi, The MJ is not the actual EarMax circuit, but a reverse engineered version, not even an EarMax Pro as well. Anyways, I believe they share same essentials and one can build a very nice MJ headamp with great passion. cheers Edison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yotiao 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2006 hey, digi, The MJ is not the actual EarMax circuit, but a reverse engineered version, not even an EarMax Pro as well. Anyways, I believe they share same essentials and one can build a very nice MJ headamp with great passion. cheers Edison Hi Edison, welcome to the forum! Off-topic here, have you tried E288CC tubes in place of the 6DJ8/6922 output tubes in Earmax pro? Can they be used together with the 12AT7? Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edison 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2006 (edited) Hi Edison, welcome to the forum! Off-topic here, have you tried E288CC tubes in place of the 6DJ8/6922 output tubes in Earmax pro? Can they be used together with the 12AT7? Thanks. hi, yotiao! I havn't used E288CC in replacing the 6DJ8/6922 output tube on EarMax Pro. It is not a premium version of 6922 but just a different design by siemens for specific usage. I am not going to try 6N1P too without inquiring the designer. E288CC is much safer than 6N1P, though. The E288CC should work on the EarMax Pro but I doubt the 6N1P will. All E288CC should be siemens made no matter what they are branded, that was what I told. I'd recommend you don't try any of them. Not only because it may damage the amp in the short term or in long term, but also because it won't give you any superior than the 6DJ8/6922 or 12at7 (input). An amp is only good to use the tubes which its circuit is designed for. cheers Edison Edited June 18, 2006 by edison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites