theory_87 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2006 ' date='28 Aug 2006, 01:19 AM' post='75837'] Sorry, I was being noobish again. Didn't know that th U2 didn't had a true line-out. Pardon my ignorance haha... it nt ignorance... haha... it impossible for 1 to know all kind of mp3 characterise in the market... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jeremy 0 Report post Posted August 30, 2006 is iriver better than ipod? We did a test using Iriver H340 & Ipod Nano. The same song was tested with the same earphone & both players are set at flat equaliser. The observation from 3 of us is that : 1) Ipod - It gave a very clean & digital sound. The sound is crystal clear. 2) Iriver - It gave an analog & more realistic sound. U can feel the singer is singing in front of u. Its up to u wat kind of sound u are looking for. My friend prefer his Ipod Nano while my other friend & I prefer the Iriver. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
radioactive28 0 Report post Posted August 30, 2006 Meaning to say iriver's amp chip has crosstalk? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jeremy 0 Report post Posted August 30, 2006 Meaning to say iriver's amp chip has crosstalk? Not really cross talk. It had more emotion & ambience to the sound. Ipod is very crystal clean. It totally removed all this thing. The sound is quite unreal. But its better that u have a listened by yourself. The only bad encountered that I had with my H340 is there will be some irritating sound once a while. I believed all hard disks player should have this sound, think its caused by the spinning of the disk. I actually buy the H10 initially but find the storage is not really enough so I exchanged for the H340 which offer me much more feature & storage. Sound wise, its better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theory_87 0 Report post Posted August 30, 2006 (edited) so how do h10 sound compare to h340? Edited August 30, 2006 by theory_87 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jeremy 0 Report post Posted September 1, 2006 (edited) so how do h10 sound compare to h340? The reasons why I changed to H340 are : 1) 5GB is too little for me. 2) I will be using it with a pair of headphone. Feel that the H340 is more suitable to do this. 3) The feature offered by the H340 ( its also come with an additional external battery pack ) no doubt that the H10 is nicer in design & build but I am looking at toughness & sound quality. 4) Sound is more powerful & better as compared to the H10. The H10 comes with 32 equalisers control. I think its too much. The H340 comes with 5 Preset EQ(Normal, Rock, Jazz, Classic, Ultra Bass) & 1 User EQ, SRS WOW ( not available in H10 ) Personnelly, I feel that the sound is much clearer for H10 ( meaning its more precise & digital to me ) than H340. But I always feel that there is always a sound limitation for compact size portable player. H340 sound is definitely more powerful & analog with so much advantages over H10. I feel its worth the price so I change it if look is not your concern. Edited September 1, 2006 by Jeremy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theory_87 0 Report post Posted September 1, 2006 ic... haha... h10 i feel the treble is roll off at the high... extension nt high nuff... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theoRECTAL Scatologist 0 Report post Posted September 1, 2006 ic... haha... h10 i feel the treble is roll off at the high... extension nt high nuff... really har? hehe... sometimes wen i play d swings i oso roll off.. hehehehehe.. hahaha.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute0 0 Report post Posted September 2, 2006 really har? hehe... sometimes wen i play d swings i oso roll off.. hehehehehe.. hahaha.. Moderators? Time to check the childish behaviour. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest joi-ful Report post Posted September 2, 2006 ' date='28 Aug 2006, 01:15 AM' post='75835'] What is a bass rolloff? I've been wanting to ask these questions nowadays.. Seems like no one is answering your qn. i agar agar know what it means but due to my inexperience with sources and cans, I don't think I'm in the best position to judge and explain this to you. But to tide you til the gurus of this forum start to open their golden mouth, roll-offs generally refer to certain frequency ranges (usually the extreme ends) where they start to sound a little soft. An example would be between my UM1 and SR60. The trebles ( to me it's approx. 7khz - 12khz and above) of the UM1 begin to sound softer, and in poorer recordings, sound better as they're less harsh with no sibilance. The trebles on the grado's, on the other hand, extend much more than the UM1 to the point they sound really harsh on some recordings. The harshness I experience may also be from the more prominent mids in certain cases but that roughly illustrates the point of roll-off (from my understanding). Like I mentioned earlier, I'm seriously newbie to this audio stuff so doing a search on this may be more useful ( and accurate!) for you. But I think you'll have to sieve through quite a bit before you can find the answer. Let's not OT too much in this thread though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites