Stereo_Electronics 0 Report post Posted November 18, 2005 (edited) Happen to come come across this sexy headphone amplifier..... USD510. Available online. Anyone? Larocco Edited November 21, 2005 by Stereo_Electronics Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute0 0 Report post Posted November 21, 2005 Sleek! But for that price, there are plenty other options, and it's quite bulky compared to portable offerings by other manufacturers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N@Z 0 Report post Posted November 21, 2005 Stereo_Electronic, do you have permission to directly link the images into SGH? If not please edit your post to leave links to the images only. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Futura 0 Report post Posted November 27, 2005 Believe it or not now you can have LaRocco PR-2 for only USD350 excluding shipping. Entitle for only first 20 buyers, get yourself one before it's too late! p/s: Damn I just ordered a SM-3 V6 one day before he announced this X'mas sales. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
replay 0 Report post Posted November 28, 2005 You can email Xin and cancel your order now. I believe he has yet to process orders that are so recent.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Futura 0 Report post Posted November 28, 2005 Nvr mind I guess I will be happy with XIN amp. Those Opamp rolling and funky switches tell me that my usd350 is well spent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
replay 0 Report post Posted November 28, 2005 USD350? I suppose u ordered it during the discount period? Still USD350?!!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Futura 0 Report post Posted November 28, 2005 Shipping plus buffer and yada yada stuff... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
replay 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 I read quite a bit abt this on Head-Fi. I'm just wondering.. the audio in jack is located at the bottom.. while the headphone jack is located at the top. Isn't it rather inconvenient for a portable? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Absolute0 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 Actually I prefer that configuration - it's less clunky and is aesthetically more pleasing than having all the jacks on one end. Another reason could be that there were space constraints when Larry was designing the amp. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
replay 0 Report post Posted January 5, 2006 Actually I prefer that configuration - it's less clunky and is aesthetically more pleasing than having all the jacks on one end. Another reason could be that there were space constraints when Larry was designing the amp. It's true that it looks less cluttered. But quite inconvenient for portables cos most likely u dun lay the amp down sideways. Anyway just find it rather weird.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rameish 0 Report post Posted January 9, 2006 topic moved Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
