Charismatic 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 IMHO, i don't think NAD products, in general, are that inferior, they are not that expensive in SG also. I got a NAD C440 tuner and it is ok to me. Of course, i don't know how to analyse "sound", i listen to music and songs for radio stations. my -2cts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N@Z 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 Very good description there fish. Never thought of musicality as timing related. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fishball79 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 (edited) Charismatic, Well NAD isn't BAD. Others are more often than not, better... Best is to compare yourself... a budget Denon tuner would be a good benchmark. N@Z, Tankew Unker. Edited June 20, 2003 by fishball79 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adhoc 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 heh you have a point there fishball. it doesnt matter whether something is good or not. it's whether you can get that same level of quality CHEAPER. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N@Z 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 Ahh... but this uncle says, "Will you honestly settle for that?" NAD isn't BAD (pun intended?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fishball79 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 Yeah, once you heard better, its hard to go back. I always preach,"If you dont compare you won't complain" Hmmm nice pun! Nah, wasn't intentional... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N@Z 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2003 I prefer, "Ignorance is bliss". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
